An occasional series of question that may well have no answer, or no reasonable or acceptable answer anyway. Feel free to comment please.
The one for today: why are nicotine and THC legally different, aside from the fact that they're legally different? Both are addictive, with a preferred delivery system that damages the lungs of the users. Yet one is banned and the other, merely regulated.
Go at it!
Because one has an entranced bass of congressmen they own and the other doesn't
ReplyDeleteThanks for the undoubtedly correct answer! If by "bass" you meant, not a large-mouth fish, rather a large-mouth politician.
Delete